So what?

We've already looked at the "what" and the "why" of the decline in social capital in late 20th century America. But at this point, it is worth asking the question of whether it really matters.

Putnam, after all, suggests that a large part of the explanation for the decline in social capital is generational change. More recent generations (starting with the Baby Boomers) are just not as active investors in social capital as earlier generations were. But, then again, lots of things change from one generation to the next. Our eating preferences change, fashions change, our taste in music changes. So what's the big deal if our preferred levels of investment in social capital changes, as well?

The next section of Putnam's book takes a look at this "So what?" question. (In fact, that's the title of his next section!) But before we move into that section, it may be worth asking that question at a personal level.

Regardless of your level of investment in social capital, are you personally content? Whether you make great investments in social capital, or spend lots of time in commuting isolation and watching television by yourself, are you happy with that level of social investment? Does your level of social capital investment match your own desires, interests, and life goals?

If you're willing, I'd appreciate it if you could share some thoughts in the comments section below. Thanks!